South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income vs Zimbabwe: NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training

South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income
7,393
in 2027
Zimbabwe
1,164
in 2027
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income rank
46th
Zimbabwe rank
48th

NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training over time

  • South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income
  • Zimbabwe
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k200520162027

How they compare

South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income currently reports 7,393 against 1,164 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 6,229.

That makes South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income's figure about 6.4 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income has been ahead every year.

South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 87 groups.

South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 9,280 565.48 8,714 South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income
2010s 9,170 570.99 8,600 South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income
2020s 7,593 1,051 6,542 South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher neet: youth not in employment, education or training, South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income or Zimbabwe?
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income, at 7,393 against 1,164 in Zimbabwe as of 2027.
What is the difference in neet: youth not in employment, education or training between South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income and Zimbabwe?
6,229, with South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income and Zimbabwe?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income and Zimbabwe rank globally for neet: youth not in employment, education or training?
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income vs Zimbabwe: NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/neet-youth-not-in-employment-education-or-training-ilo-modelled-estimates/south-eastern-asia-and-the-pacific-lower-middle-income/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/neet-youth-not-in-employment-education-or-training-ilo-modelled-estimates/south-eastern-asia-and-the-pacific-lower-middle-income/zimbabwe/">South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income vs Zimbabwe: NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled estimates)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. Youth not in education are those who were neither enrolled in school nor in a formal training program (e.g. vocational training) during a specified reference period (e.g., one week). For statistical purposes, youth are defined as persons between the ages of 15 and 24 years. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.