Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Zimbabwe: NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled)

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
0.0027 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0026 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
76th
Zimbabwe rank
79th

NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled) over time

  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  • Zimbabwe
0.0010.0020.0020.003200520142023

How they compare

Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 0.0027 units per square kilometre against 0.0026 units per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0001 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 76th and Zimbabwe ranks 79th of 186 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Congo, Democratic Republic of the averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Democratic Republic of the Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 0.001 units per square kilometre 0.0015 units per square kilometre 0.0005 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0016 units per square kilometre 0.0015 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2020s 0.0026 units per square kilometre 0.0026 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Congo, Democratic Republic of the

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher neet: youth not in employment, education or training (ilo modelled), Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Zimbabwe?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 0.0027 units per square kilometre against 0.0026 units per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in neet: youth not in employment, education or training (ilo modelled) between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Zimbabwe?
0.0001 units per square kilometre, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Zimbabwe?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Zimbabwe rank globally for neet: youth not in employment, education or training (ilo modelled)?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 76th and Zimbabwe ranks 79th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled estimates), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Zimbabwe: NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/neet-youth-not-in-employment-education-or-training-ilo-modelled-estimates-per-square/congo-dem-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/neet-youth-not-in-employment-education-or-training-ilo-modelled-estimates-per-square/congo-dem-rep/zimbabwe/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Zimbabwe: NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled estimates), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 3,569 data points, 2005–2023
Last refreshed

NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled estimates) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.