What is the difference in neet: youth not in employment, education or training (ilo modelled) between Republic of Moldova and New Zealand?

0 units per person, with Republic of Moldova ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and New Zealand?

21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled estimates), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Republic of Moldova vs New Zealand: NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled)

Republic of Moldova

0 units per person

in 2025

New Zealand

0 units per person

in 2025

Republic of Moldova rank

131st

New Zealand rank

133rd

NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled) over time

Republic of Moldova
New Zealand

How they compare

Republic of Moldova currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in New Zealand, a difference of 0 units per person.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Republic of Moldova has been ahead every year.

Republic of Moldova ranks 131st and New Zealand ranks 133rd of 186 countries.

Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Republic of Moldova	New Zealand	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0001 units per person	0 units per person	0 units per person	Republic of Moldova
2010s	0 units per person	0 units per person	0 units per person	Republic of Moldova
2020s	0 units per person	0 units per person	0 units per person	Republic of Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher neet: youth not in employment, education or training (ilo modelled), Republic of Moldova or New Zealand?: Republic of Moldova, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in neet: youth not in employment, education or training (ilo modelled) between Republic of Moldova and New Zealand?: 0 units per person, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and New Zealand?: 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Republic of Moldova and New Zealand rank globally for neet: youth not in employment, education or training (ilo modelled)?: Republic of Moldova ranks 131st and New Zealand ranks 133rd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled estimates), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Moldova vs New Zealand: NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/neet-youth-not-in-employment-education-or-training-ilo-modelled-estimates-per-capita/moldova/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/neet-youth-not-in-employment-education-or-training-ilo-modelled-estimates-per-capita/moldova/new-zealand/">Republic of Moldova vs New Zealand: NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled estimates), per capita
Unit: units per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 189 places, 3,955 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed: 25 August 2026

NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled estimates) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.