Europe and Central Asia: High income vs Zimbabwe: NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled)

Europe and Central Asia: High income
2.04 % change on previous year
in 2027
Zimbabwe
3.37 % change on previous year
in 2027
Europe and Central Asia: High income rank
32nd
Zimbabwe rank
34th

NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled) over time

  • Europe and Central Asia: High income
  • Zimbabwe
-5051015200620162027

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 3.37 % change on previous year against 2.04 % change on previous year in Europe and Central Asia: High income, a difference of 1.33 % change on previous year.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.7 times Europe and Central Asia: High income's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Europe and Central Asia: High income ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 87 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Europe and Central Asia: High income averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe and Central Asia: High income Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s -1.4 % change on previous year -3.53 % change on previous year 2.13 % change on previous year Europe and Central Asia: High income
2010s -3.66 % change on previous year 5.69 % change on previous year 9.35 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2020s 0.5592 % change on previous year 3.7 % change on previous year 3.14 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher neet: youth not in employment, education or training (ilo modelled), Europe and Central Asia: High income or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 3.37 % change on previous year against 2.04 % change on previous year in Europe and Central Asia: High income as of 2027.
What is the difference in neet: youth not in employment, education or training (ilo modelled) between Europe and Central Asia: High income and Zimbabwe?
1.33 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe and Central Asia: High income and Zimbabwe?
22 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2027.
How do Europe and Central Asia: High income and Zimbabwe rank globally for neet: youth not in employment, education or training (ilo modelled)?
Europe and Central Asia: High income ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled estimates), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe and Central Asia: High income vs Zimbabwe: NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/neet-youth-not-in-employment-education-or-training-ilo-modelled-estimates-annual-growth/europe-and-central-asia-high-income/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/neet-youth-not-in-employment-education-or-training-ilo-modelled-estimates-annual-growth/europe-and-central-asia-high-income/zimbabwe/">Europe and Central Asia: High income vs Zimbabwe: NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled estimates), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
276 places, 6,048 data points, 2006–2027
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled estimates). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.