Belarus vs Southern Asia: Upper-middle income: NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled)

Belarus
3.73 % change on previous year
in 2027
Southern Asia: Upper-middle income
2.4 % change on previous year
in 2027
Belarus rank
26th
Southern Asia: Upper-middle income rank
27th

NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled) over time

  • Belarus
  • Southern Asia: Upper-middle income
-20-1001020200620162027

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 3.73 % change on previous year against 2.4 % change on previous year in Southern Asia: Upper-middle income, a difference of 1.33 % change on previous year.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.6 times Southern Asia: Upper-middle income's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Southern Asia: Upper-middle income ahead.

Belarus ranks 26th and Southern Asia: Upper-middle income ranks 27th of 188 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Southern Asia: Upper-middle income in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Southern Asia: Upper-middle income Difference Ahead
2000s -8.84 % change on previous year -2.16 % change on previous year 6.68 % change on previous year Southern Asia: Upper-middle income
2010s -8.96 % change on previous year -5.12 % change on previous year 3.84 % change on previous year Southern Asia: Upper-middle income
2020s 0.2095 % change on previous year -0.6892 % change on previous year 0.8987 % change on previous year Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher neet: youth not in employment, education or training (ilo modelled), Belarus or Southern Asia: Upper-middle income?
Belarus, at 3.73 % change on previous year against 2.4 % change on previous year in Southern Asia: Upper-middle income as of 2027.
What is the difference in neet: youth not in employment, education or training (ilo modelled) between Belarus and Southern Asia: Upper-middle income?
1.33 % change on previous year, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Southern Asia: Upper-middle income?
22 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2027.
How do Belarus and Southern Asia: Upper-middle income rank globally for neet: youth not in employment, education or training (ilo modelled)?
Belarus ranks 26th and Southern Asia: Upper-middle income ranks 27th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled estimates), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Southern Asia: Upper-middle income: NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/neet-youth-not-in-employment-education-or-training-ilo-modelled-estimates-annual-growth/belarus/southern-asia-upper-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/neet-youth-not-in-employment-education-or-training-ilo-modelled-estimates-annual-growth/belarus/southern-asia-upper-middle-income/">Belarus vs Southern Asia: Upper-middle income: NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled estimates), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
276 places, 6,048 data points, 2006–2027
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled estimates). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.