Solomon Islands vs Chinese Taipei: NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training
NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training over time
- Solomon Islands
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Chinese Taipei currently reports 8.66 against 8.35 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.31.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Chinese Taipei has been ahead every year.
Solomon Islands ranks 164th and Chinese Taipei ranks 163rd of 188 countries.
Chinese Taipei has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.14 | 16.38 | 8.24 | Chinese Taipei |
| 2010s | 7.23 | 14.08 | 6.85 | Chinese Taipei |
| 2020s | 8.1 | 9.66 | 1.56 | Chinese Taipei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neet rate: share of youth not in employment, education or training, Solomon Islands or Chinese Taipei?
- Chinese Taipei, at 8.66 against 8.35 in Solomon Islands as of 2027.
- What is the difference in neet rate: share of youth not in employment, education or training between Solomon Islands and Chinese Taipei?
- 0.31, with Chinese Taipei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Chinese Taipei?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
- How do Solomon Islands and Chinese Taipei rank globally for neet rate: share of youth not in employment, education or training?
- Solomon Islands ranks 164th and Chinese Taipei ranks 163rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. This indicator refers to the proportion of youth who are not in employment and not in education or training. Youth not in education are those who were neither enrolled in school nor in a formal training program (e.g. vocational training). For statistical purposes, youth are defined as persons between the ages of 15 and 24 years. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.