Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income vs Georgia: NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training

Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
14.26
in 2027
Georgia
24.13
in 2027
Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income rank
64th
Georgia rank
61st

NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training over time

  • Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
  • Georgia
010203040200520162027

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 24.13 against 14.26 in Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income, a difference of 9.87.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.7 times Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income ranks 64th and Georgia ranks 61st of 87 groups.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income Georgia Difference Ahead
2000s 19.49 31.01 11.52 Georgia
2010s 15.81 29.2 13.38 Georgia
2020s 14.1 24.1 10 Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher neet rate: share of youth not in employment, education or training, Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income or Georgia?
Georgia, at 24.13 against 14.26 in Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income as of 2027.
What is the difference in neet rate: share of youth not in employment, education or training between Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income and Georgia?
9.87, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income and Georgia?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income and Georgia rank globally for neet rate: share of youth not in employment, education or training?
Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income ranks 64th and Georgia ranks 61st of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income vs Georgia: NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/neet-rate-share-of-youth-not-in-employment-education-or-training-ilo-modelled-estimates/asia-and-the-pacific-upper-middle-income/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/neet-rate-share-of-youth-not-in-employment-education-or-training-ilo-modelled-estimates/asia-and-the-pacific-upper-middle-income/georgia/">Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income vs Georgia: NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled estimates)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. This indicator refers to the proportion of youth who are not in employment and not in education or training. Youth not in education are those who were neither enrolled in school nor in a formal training program (e.g. vocational training). For statistical purposes, youth are defined as persons between the ages of 15 and 24 years. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.