Asia and the Pacific: High income vs Bhutan: NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education … modelled
NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education … modelled over time
- Asia and the Pacific: High income
- Bhutan
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 19.97 against 6.49 in Asia and the Pacific: High income, a difference of 13.48.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 3.1 times Asia and the Pacific: High income's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.
Asia and the Pacific: High income ranks 86th and Bhutan ranks 84th of 87 groups.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Asia and the Pacific: High income | Bhutan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.3 | 13.29 | 4.99 | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 8.02 | 14.31 | 6.29 | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 6.83 | 17.34 | 10.51 | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neet rate: share of youth not in employment, education or training, Asia and the Pacific: High income or Bhutan?
- Bhutan, at 19.97 against 6.49 in Asia and the Pacific: High income as of 2027.
- What is the difference in neet rate: share of youth not in employment, education or training between Asia and the Pacific: High income and Bhutan?
- 13.48, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and the Pacific: High income and Bhutan?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
- How do Asia and the Pacific: High income and Bhutan rank globally for neet rate: share of youth not in employment, education or training?
- Asia and the Pacific: High income ranks 86th and Bhutan ranks 84th of 87 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. This indicator refers to the proportion of youth who are not in employment and not in education or training. Youth not in education are those who were neither enrolled in school nor in a formal training program (e.g. vocational training). For statistical purposes, youth are defined as persons between the ages of 15 and 24 years. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.