Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Existence of a national strategy for youth employment
Mauritius
2 score
in 2025
Sao Tome and Principe
2 score
in 2025
Mauritius rank
42nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
42nd
Existence of a national strategy for youth employment over time
- Mauritius
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 2 score against 2 score in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 score.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 42nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 42nd of 75 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1 score | 2 score | 1 score | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2020s | 1.5 score | 2.25 score | 0.75 score | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher existence of a national strategy for youth employment, Mauritius or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Mauritius, at 2 score against 2 score in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in existence of a national strategy for youth employment between Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0 score, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.
- How do Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for existence of a national strategy for youth employment?
- Mauritius ranks 42nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 42nd of 75 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Existence of a national strategy for youth employment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Level of development and implementation of a national strategy for youth employment, in a scale from 0 to 3. 0 means no strategy exists, and 3 means that the strategy is developed and operationalized.