China vs Serbia: Existence of a national strategy for youth employment
China
3 score
in 2025
Serbia
3 score
in 2025
China rank
1st
Serbia rank
1st
Existence of a national strategy for youth employment over time
- China
- Serbia
How they compare
China currently reports 3 score against 3 score in Serbia, a difference of 0 score.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
China ranks 1st and Serbia ranks 1st of 75 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2 score | 3 score | 1 score | Serbia |
| 2020s | 2.5 score | 3 score | 0.5 score | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher existence of a national strategy for youth employment, China or Serbia?
- China, at 3 score against 3 score in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in existence of a national strategy for youth employment between China and Serbia?
- 0 score, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.
- How do China and Serbia rank globally for existence of a national strategy for youth employment?
- China ranks 1st and Serbia ranks 1st of 75 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Existence of a national strategy for youth employment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Level of development and implementation of a national strategy for youth employment, in a scale from 0 to 3. 0 means no strategy exists, and 3 means that the strategy is developed and operationalized.