China vs Latvia: Existence of a national strategy for youth employment
China
3 score
in 2025
Latvia
3 score
in 2025
China rank
1st
Latvia rank
1st
Existence of a national strategy for youth employment over time
- China
- Latvia
How they compare
China currently reports 3 score against 3 score in Latvia, a difference of 0 score.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
China ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 75 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2 score | 3 score | 1 score | Latvia |
| 2020s | 2.5 score | 3 score | 0.5 score | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher existence of a national strategy for youth employment, China or Latvia?
- China, at 3 score against 3 score in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in existence of a national strategy for youth employment between China and Latvia?
- 0 score, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.
- How do China and Latvia rank globally for existence of a national strategy for youth employment?
- China ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 75 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Existence of a national strategy for youth employment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Level of development and implementation of a national strategy for youth employment, in a scale from 0 to 3. 0 means no strategy exists, and 3 means that the strategy is developed and operationalized.