Japan vs Lithuania: Monthly unemployment levels
Monthly unemployment levels over time
- Japan
- Lithuania
How they compare
Japan currently reports 1,758 Persons against 107.75 Persons in Lithuania, a difference of 1,650 Persons.
That makes Japan's figure about 16.3 times Lithuania's.
Across all 28 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 6th and Lithuania ranks 7th of 32 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,979 Persons | 237.83 Persons | 2,741 Persons | Japan |
| 2000s | 3,109 Persons | 174.03 Persons | 2,935 Persons | Japan |
| 2010s | 2,371 Persons | 156.12 Persons | 2,215 Persons | Japan |
| 2020s | 1,827 Persons | 107.5 Persons | 1,720 Persons | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monthly unemployment levels, Japan or Lithuania?
- Japan, at 1,758 Persons against 107.75 Persons in Lithuania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in monthly unemployment levels between Japan and Lithuania?
- 1,650 Persons, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Lithuania?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2025.
- How do Japan and Lithuania rank globally for monthly unemployment levels?
- Japan ranks 6th and Lithuania ranks 7th of 32 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Monthly unemployment levels. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The infra-annual dataflow on the monthly unemployed population is a subset of the infra-annual labour statistics database, which contains predominantly monthly and quarterly statistics on the unemployed population by age groups (15+, 15-24, 25-54, 55-64, 15-64 and 15-74 where available) and sex and associated statistical methodological information and associated statistical methodological information, for the OECD member countries and for selected other economies. Chile, Costa Rica, and the United Kingdom publish Labour Force Survey (LFS) data using a rolling quarter methodology. The OECD treats the middle month of the rolling quarter as the reference month. As a result, the publication of monthly LFS data for these countries may be delayed by one month or more relative to the OECD reference month. The unemployed are persons in their working age who, in the reference period, do not have a job; are available for work; and, have taken specific steps to find a job. The infra-annual labour statistics compiled for all OECD member countries, are drawn from Labour Force Surveys based on definition provided by the 19th Conference of Labour Statisticians in 2013. The uniform application of these definitions across all OECD member countries results in estimates that are internationally comparable.