G7 vs United States of America: Monthly unemployment levels

G7
16,924 Persons
in 2024
United States of America
6,761 Persons
in 2024
G7 rank
1st
United States of America rank
2nd

Monthly unemployment levels over time

  • G7
  • United States of America
010.0k20.0k30.0k195519892024

How they compare

G7 currently reports 16,924 Persons against 6,761 Persons in United States of America, a difference of 10,163 Persons.

That makes G7's figure about 2.5 times United States of America's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, G7 has been ahead every year.

G7 ranks 1st and United States of America ranks 2nd of 10 groups.

G7 has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade G7 United States of America Difference Ahead
1990s 22,134 Persons 7,627 Persons 14,507 Persons G7
2000s 22,211 Persons 8,265 Persons 13,946 Persons G7
2010s 22,841 Persons 9,750 Persons 13,091 Persons G7
2020s 18,638 Persons 8,082 Persons 10,556 Persons G7

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher monthly unemployment levels, G7 or United States of America?
G7, at 16,924 Persons against 6,761 Persons in United States of America as of 2024.
What is the difference in monthly unemployment levels between G7 and United States of America?
10,163 Persons, with G7 ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for G7 and United States of America?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do G7 and United States of America rank globally for monthly unemployment levels?
G7 ranks 1st and United States of America ranks 2nd of 10 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Monthly unemployment levels. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

G7 vs United States of America: Monthly unemployment levels. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/monthly-unemployment-levels/g7/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/monthly-unemployment-levels/g7/united-states/">G7 vs United States of America: Monthly unemployment levels</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Monthly unemployment levels
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
45 places, 1,684 data points, 1955–2025
Last refreshed

The infra-annual dataflow on the monthly unemployed population is a subset of the infra-annual labour statistics database, which contains predominantly monthly and quarterly statistics on the unemployed population by age groups (15+, 15-24, 25-54, 55-64, 15-64 and 15-74 where available) and sex and associated statistical methodological information and associated statistical methodological information, for the OECD member countries and for selected other economies. Chile, Costa Rica, and the United Kingdom publish Labour Force Survey (LFS) data using a rolling quarter methodology. The OECD treats the middle month of the rolling quarter as the reference month. As a result, the publication of monthly LFS data for these countries may be delayed by one month or more relative to the OECD reference month. The unemployed are persons in their working age who, in the reference period, do not have a job; are available for work; and, have taken specific steps to find a job. The infra-annual labour statistics compiled for all OECD member countries, are drawn from Labour Force Surveys based on definition provided by the 19th Conference of Labour Statisticians in 2013. The uniform application of these definitions across all OECD member countries results in estimates that are internationally comparable.