Denmark vs New Zealand: Monthly unemployment levels

Denmark
209 Persons
in 2025
New Zealand
159.8 Persons
in 2025
Denmark rank
23rd
New Zealand rank
24th

Monthly unemployment levels over time

  • Denmark
  • New Zealand
0100200300195619902025

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 209 Persons against 159.8 Persons in New Zealand, a difference of 49.2 Persons.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.3 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 23rd and New Zealand ranks 24th of 32 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark New Zealand Difference Ahead
1980s 178.3 Persons 81.49 Persons 96.81 Persons Denmark
1990s 195.79 Persons 144.91 Persons 50.89 Persons Denmark
2000s 135.4 Persons 98.64 Persons 36.76 Persons Denmark
2010s 191.55 Persons 133.88 Persons 57.67 Persons Denmark
2020s 172.83 Persons 125.88 Persons 46.95 Persons Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher monthly unemployment levels, Denmark or New Zealand?
Denmark, at 209 Persons against 159.8 Persons in New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in monthly unemployment levels between Denmark and New Zealand?
49.2 Persons, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and New Zealand?
43 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2025.
How do Denmark and New Zealand rank globally for monthly unemployment levels?
Denmark ranks 23rd and New Zealand ranks 24th of 32 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Monthly unemployment levels. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs New Zealand: Monthly unemployment levels. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/monthly-unemployment-levels/denmark/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/monthly-unemployment-levels/denmark/new-zealand/">Denmark vs New Zealand: Monthly unemployment levels</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Monthly unemployment levels
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
45 places, 1,684 data points, 1955–2025
Last refreshed

The infra-annual dataflow on the monthly unemployed population is a subset of the infra-annual labour statistics database, which contains predominantly monthly and quarterly statistics on the unemployed population by age groups (15+, 15-24, 25-54, 55-64, 15-64 and 15-74 where available) and sex and associated statistical methodological information and associated statistical methodological information, for the OECD member countries and for selected other economies. Chile, Costa Rica, and the United Kingdom publish Labour Force Survey (LFS) data using a rolling quarter methodology. The OECD treats the middle month of the rolling quarter as the reference month. As a result, the publication of monthly LFS data for these countries may be delayed by one month or more relative to the OECD reference month. The unemployed are persons in their working age who, in the reference period, do not have a job; are available for work; and, have taken specific steps to find a job. The infra-annual labour statistics compiled for all OECD member countries, are drawn from Labour Force Surveys based on definition provided by the 19th Conference of Labour Statisticians in 2013. The uniform application of these definitions across all OECD member countries results in estimates that are internationally comparable.