Malaysia vs Rwanda: Modeled female employment to population ratio
Malaysia
49.65
in 2025
Rwanda
49.95
in 2025
Malaysia rank
96th
Rwanda rank
93rd
Modeled female employment to population ratio over time
- Malaysia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 49.95 against 49.65 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.3.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Rwanda ahead.
Malaysia ranks 96th and Rwanda ranks 93rd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 36.52 | 45.47 | 8.96 | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 40.92 | 47.14 | 6.22 | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 47.56 | 47.43 | 0.1296 | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 49.34 | 47.92 | 1.42 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher modeled female employment to population ratio, Malaysia or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 49.95 against 49.65 in Malaysia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in modeled female employment to population ratio between Malaysia and Rwanda?
- 0.3, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Malaysia and Rwanda rank globally for modeled female employment to population ratio?
- Malaysia ranks 96th and Rwanda ranks 93rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Modeled female employment to population ratio. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.