Barbados vs Zimbabwe: Modeled female employment to population ratio
Barbados
56.78
in 2025
Zimbabwe
56.33
in 2025
Barbados rank
46th
Zimbabwe rank
48th
Modeled female employment to population ratio over time
- Barbados
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 56.78 against 56.33 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.45.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Barbados ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48.94 | 57.54 | 8.6 | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 57.47 | 57.85 | 0.3858 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 56.48 | 56.88 | 0.3996 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 55.54 | 55.13 | 0.4067 | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher modeled female employment to population ratio, Barbados or Zimbabwe?
- Barbados, at 56.78 against 56.33 in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in modeled female employment to population ratio between Barbados and Zimbabwe?
- 0.45, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Barbados and Zimbabwe rank globally for modeled female employment to population ratio?
- Barbados ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Modeled female employment to population ratio. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.