Latvia vs Luxembourg: Minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers

Latvia
38.06 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees
in 2025
Luxembourg
45.49 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees
in 2025
Latvia rank
5th
Luxembourg rank
9th

Minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers over time

  • Latvia
  • Luxembourg
01020304050196019922025

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 45.49 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees against 38.06 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees in Latvia, a difference of 7.43 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 5th and Luxembourg ranks 9th of 7 groups.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Luxembourg Difference Ahead
1990s 25.06 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 46.2 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 21.14 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees Luxembourg
2000s 30.14 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 45.16 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 15.02 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees Luxembourg
2010s 38.8 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 44.67 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 5.87 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees Luxembourg
2020s 36.07 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 44.29 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 8.23 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers, Latvia or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 45.49 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees against 38.06 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers between Latvia and Luxembourg?
7.43 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Luxembourg?
29 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2025.
How do Latvia and Luxembourg rank globally for minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers?
Latvia ranks 5th and Luxembourg ranks 9th of 7 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Luxembourg: Minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/minimum-relative-to-average-wages-of-full-time-workers/latvia-2/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/minimum-relative-to-average-wages-of-full-time-workers/latvia-2/luxembourg/">Latvia vs Luxembourg: Minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers
Unit
Percentage of average wage of full-time employees
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
33 places, 1,325 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

For cross-country comparisons, data on minimum wage levels are further supplemented with another measure of minimum wages relative to average wages, that is, the ratio of minimum wages to median earnings of full-time employees. Median rather than mean earnings provide a better basis for international comparisons as it accounts for differences in earnings dispersion across countries. However, while median of basic earnings of full-time workers - i.e. excluding overtime and bonus payments - are ideally, the preferred measure of average wages for international comparisons of minimum-to-median earnings, they are not available for a large number of countries. Minimum relative to mean earnings of full-time workers are also provided.