Latvia vs Lithuania: Minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers

Latvia
38.06 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees
in 2025
Lithuania
41.9 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees
in 2025
Latvia rank
5th
Lithuania rank
3rd

Minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers over time

  • Latvia
  • Lithuania
01020304050199720112025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 41.9 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees against 38.06 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees in Latvia, a difference of 3.84 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Lithuania ahead.

Latvia ranks 5th and Lithuania ranks 3rd of 7 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 25.06 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 38.86 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 13.79 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees Lithuania
2000s 30.14 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 34.93 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 4.79 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees Lithuania
2010s 38.8 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 41.5 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 2.7 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees Lithuania
2020s 36.07 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 40.3 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 4.23 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers, Latvia or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 41.9 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees against 38.06 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers between Latvia and Lithuania?
3.84 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Lithuania?
29 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2025.
How do Latvia and Lithuania rank globally for minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers?
Latvia ranks 5th and Lithuania ranks 3rd of 7 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Lithuania: Minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 10 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/minimum-relative-to-average-wages-of-full-time-workers/latvia-2/lithuania-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/minimum-relative-to-average-wages-of-full-time-workers/latvia-2/lithuania-2/">Latvia vs Lithuania: Minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers
Unit
Percentage of average wage of full-time employees
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
33 places, 1,325 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

For cross-country comparisons, data on minimum wage levels are further supplemented with another measure of minimum wages relative to average wages, that is, the ratio of minimum wages to median earnings of full-time employees. Median rather than mean earnings provide a better basis for international comparisons as it accounts for differences in earnings dispersion across countries. However, while median of basic earnings of full-time workers - i.e. excluding overtime and bonus payments - are ideally, the preferred measure of average wages for international comparisons of minimum-to-median earnings, they are not available for a large number of countries. Minimum relative to mean earnings of full-time workers are also provided.