Korea vs New Zealand: Minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers

Korea
47.21 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees
in 2025
New Zealand
54.56 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees
in 2025
Korea rank
1st
New Zealand rank
4th

Minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers over time

  • Korea
  • New Zealand
203040506070196019922025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 54.56 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees against 47.21 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees in Korea, a difference of 7.35 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Korea's.

Across all 38 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Korea ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 4th of 3 groups.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Korea New Zealand Difference Ahead
1980s 26.98 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 48.51 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 21.52 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees New Zealand
1990s 25.13 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 45.19 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 20.06 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees New Zealand
2000s 29.65 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 47.64 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 17.98 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees New Zealand
2010s 39.11 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 51.5 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 12.39 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees New Zealand
2020s 48.25 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 56.12 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 7.87 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers, Korea or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 54.56 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees against 47.21 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees in Korea as of 2025.
What is the difference in minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers between Korea and New Zealand?
7.35 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and New Zealand?
38 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2025.
How do Korea and New Zealand rank globally for minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers?
Korea ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 4th of 3 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Korea vs New Zealand: Minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/minimum-relative-to-average-wages-of-full-time-workers/korea/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/minimum-relative-to-average-wages-of-full-time-workers/korea/new-zealand/">Korea vs New Zealand: Minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers
Unit
Percentage of average wage of full-time employees
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
33 places, 1,325 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

For cross-country comparisons, data on minimum wage levels are further supplemented with another measure of minimum wages relative to average wages, that is, the ratio of minimum wages to median earnings of full-time employees. Median rather than mean earnings provide a better basis for international comparisons as it accounts for differences in earnings dispersion across countries. However, while median of basic earnings of full-time workers - i.e. excluding overtime and bonus payments - are ideally, the preferred measure of average wages for international comparisons of minimum-to-median earnings, they are not available for a large number of countries. Minimum relative to mean earnings of full-time workers are also provided.