Australia vs France: Minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers

Australia
46.43 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees
in 2025
France
50.42 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees
in 2025
Australia rank
7th
France rank
6th

Minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers over time

  • Australia
  • France
0204060196019922025

How they compare

France currently reports 50.42 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees against 46.43 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees in Australia, a difference of 3.99 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees.

That makes France's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 7th and France ranks 6th of 23 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and France in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia France Difference Ahead
1980s 57.4 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 50.01 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 7.4 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees Australia
1990s 54.63 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 49.31 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 5.32 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees Australia
2000s 48.05 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 51.43 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 3.38 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees France
2010s 44.49 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 50.2 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 5.71 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees France
2020s 45.07 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 49.8 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees 4.72 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers, Australia or France?
France, at 50.42 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees against 46.43 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees in Australia as of 2025.
What is the difference in minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers between Australia and France?
3.99 Percentage of average wage of full-time employees, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and France?
41 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2025.
How do Australia and France rank globally for minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers?
Australia ranks 7th and France ranks 6th of 23 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs France: Minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/minimum-relative-to-average-wages-of-full-time-workers/australia/france/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/minimum-relative-to-average-wages-of-full-time-workers/australia/france/">Australia vs France: Minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Minimum relative to average wages of full-time workers
Unit
Percentage of average wage of full-time employees
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
33 places, 1,325 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

For cross-country comparisons, data on minimum wage levels are further supplemented with another measure of minimum wages relative to average wages, that is, the ratio of minimum wages to median earnings of full-time employees. Median rather than mean earnings provide a better basis for international comparisons as it accounts for differences in earnings dispersion across countries. However, while median of basic earnings of full-time workers - i.e. excluding overtime and bonus payments - are ideally, the preferred measure of average wages for international comparisons of minimum-to-median earnings, they are not available for a large number of countries. Minimum relative to mean earnings of full-time workers are also provided.