Rwanda vs Palestine: LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO)

Rwanda
29.94
in 2025
Palestine
31.51
in 2025
Rwanda rank
4th
Palestine rank
3rd

LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO) over time

  • Rwanda
  • Palestine
010203040201420192025

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 31.51 against 29.94 in Rwanda, a difference of 1.57.

That makes Palestine's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 4th and Palestine ranks 3rd of 75 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Palestine Difference Ahead
2010s 39.94 33.55 6.39 Rwanda
2020s 37.47 33.42 4.05 Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher lu4: composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ilo), Rwanda or Palestine?
Palestine, at 31.51 against 29.94 in Rwanda as of 2025.
What is the difference in lu4: composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ilo) between Rwanda and Palestine?
1.57, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Palestine?
8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
How do Rwanda and Palestine rank globally for lu4: composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ilo)?
Rwanda ranks 4th and Palestine ranks 3rd of 75 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Palestine: LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/lu4-composite-rate-of-labour-underutilization-previous-ilo-definition-icls13-15/rwanda/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/lu4-composite-rate-of-labour-underutilization-previous-ilo-definition-icls13-15/rwanda/west-bank-and-gaza/">Rwanda vs Palestine: LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) (15+)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
75 places, 1,249 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. LU4 represents the share of the extended labour force that are in unemployment, time-related underemployment or the potential labour force. Data disaggregated by level of education are provided on the highest level of education completed, classified according to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED). Data may have been regrouped from national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISCED. For more information, refer to the Education and Mismatch Indicators (EMI) database description.