Chile vs Zimbabwe: LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO)

Chile
22.48
in 2025
Zimbabwe
25.96
in 2024
Chile rank
8th
Zimbabwe rank
6th

LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO) over time

  • Chile
  • Zimbabwe
0102030201020172025

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 25.96 against 22.48 in Chile, a difference of 3.48.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 8th and Zimbabwe ranks 6th of 75 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 25 20.61 4.39 Chile
2020s 21.97 24.18 2.21 Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher lu4: composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ilo), Chile or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 25.96 against 22.48 in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in lu4: composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ilo) between Chile and Zimbabwe?
3.48, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zimbabwe?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2024.
How do Chile and Zimbabwe rank globally for lu4: composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ilo)?
Chile ranks 8th and Zimbabwe ranks 6th of 75 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Zimbabwe: LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/lu4-composite-rate-of-labour-underutilization-previous-ilo-definition-icls13-15/chile/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/lu4-composite-rate-of-labour-underutilization-previous-ilo-definition-icls13-15/chile/zimbabwe/">Chile vs Zimbabwe: LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) (15+)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
75 places, 1,249 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. LU4 represents the share of the extended labour force that are in unemployment, time-related underemployment or the potential labour force. Data disaggregated by level of education are provided on the highest level of education completed, classified according to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED). Data may have been regrouped from national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISCED. For more information, refer to the Education and Mismatch Indicators (EMI) database description.