Canada vs Mauritius: LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO)
LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO) over time
- Canada
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 9.6 against 8.85 in Canada, a difference of 0.75.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 54th and Mauritius ranks 52nd of 75 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lu4: composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ilo), Canada or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 9.6 against 8.85 in Canada as of 2019.
- What is the difference in lu4: composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ilo) between Canada and Mauritius?
- 0.75, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Mauritius?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Canada and Mauritius rank globally for lu4: composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ilo)?
- Canada ranks 54th and Mauritius ranks 52nd of 75 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. LU4 represents the share of the extended labour force that are in unemployment, time-related underemployment or the potential labour force. Data disaggregated by level of education are provided on the highest level of education completed, classified according to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED). Data may have been regrouped from national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISCED. For more information, refer to the Education and Mismatch Indicators (EMI) database description.