El Salvador vs Mongolia: LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (current ILO)
LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (current ILO) over time
- El Salvador
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 7.58 against 7.51 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.07.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 46th and Mongolia ranks 44th of 56 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lu4: composite rate of labour underutilization (current ilo), El Salvador or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 7.58 against 7.51 in El Salvador as of 2025.
- What is the difference in lu4: composite rate of labour underutilization (current ilo) between El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 0.07, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2025.
- How do El Salvador and Mongolia rank globally for lu4: composite rate of labour underutilization (current ilo)?
- El Salvador ranks 46th and Mongolia ranks 44th of 56 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization (current ILO definition - ICLS19) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series includes only countries for which the 19th ICLS definitions are applied. LU4 represents the share of the extended labour force that are in unemployment, time-related underemployment or the potential labour force. For more information, refer to the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database description.