World: Low income vs Zimbabwe: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization

World: Low income
68,902
in 2027
Zimbabwe
1,657
in 2024
World: Low income rank
21st
Zimbabwe rank
22nd

LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization over time

  • World: Low income
  • Zimbabwe
020.0k40.0k60.0k200520162027

How they compare

World: Low income currently reports 68,902 against 1,657 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 67,245.

That makes World: Low income's figure about 41.6 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, World: Low income has been ahead every year.

World: Low income ranks 21st and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 87 groups.

World: Low income has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade World: Low income Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 50,885 1,340 49,545 World: Low income
2020s 60,640 1,588 59,053 World: Low income

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization, World: Low income or Zimbabwe?
World: Low income, at 68,902 against 1,657 in Zimbabwe as of 2027.
What is the difference in lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization between World: Low income and Zimbabwe?
67,245, with World: Low income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for World: Low income and Zimbabwe?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2024.
How do World: Low income and Zimbabwe rank globally for lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization?
World: Low income ranks 21st and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

World: Low income vs Zimbabwe: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/lu4-composite-measure-of-labour-underutilization/world-low-income/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/lu4-composite-measure-of-labour-underutilization/world-low-income/zimbabwe/">World: Low income vs Zimbabwe: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
166 places, 3,284 data points, 1991–2027
Last refreshed

With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. LU4 represents the share of the extended labour force that are in unemployment, time-related underemployment or the potential labour force. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.