Kyrgyzstan vs Northern Africa: Lower-middle income: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization

Kyrgyzstan
172.1
in 2023
Northern Africa: Lower-middle income
11,190
in 2027
Kyrgyzstan rank
60th
Northern Africa: Lower-middle income rank
61st

LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Northern Africa: Lower-middle income
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k200520162027

How they compare

Northern Africa: Lower-middle income currently reports 11,190 against 172.1 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 11,018.

That makes Northern Africa: Lower-middle income's figure about 65.0 times Kyrgyzstan's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Northern Africa: Lower-middle income has been ahead every year.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 60th and Northern Africa: Lower-middle income ranks 61st of 79 countries.

Northern Africa: Lower-middle income has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Northern Africa: Lower-middle income Difference Ahead
2010s 258.98 11,758 11,499 Northern Africa: Lower-middle income
2020s 199.45 10,610 10,411 Northern Africa: Lower-middle income

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization, Kyrgyzstan or Northern Africa: Lower-middle income?
Northern Africa: Lower-middle income, at 11,190 against 172.1 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2027.
What is the difference in lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization between Kyrgyzstan and Northern Africa: Lower-middle income?
11,018, with Northern Africa: Lower-middle income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Northern Africa: Lower-middle income?
13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Northern Africa: Lower-middle income rank globally for lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 60th and Northern Africa: Lower-middle income ranks 61st of 79 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Northern Africa: Lower-middle income: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/lu4-composite-measure-of-labour-underutilization/kyrgyz-republic/northern-africa-lower-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/lu4-composite-measure-of-labour-underutilization/kyrgyz-republic/northern-africa-lower-middle-income/">Kyrgyzstan vs Northern Africa: Lower-middle income: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
166 places, 3,284 data points, 1991–2027
Last refreshed

With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. LU4 represents the share of the extended labour force that are in unemployment, time-related underemployment or the potential labour force. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.