Georgia vs South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization
LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization over time
- Georgia
- South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income
How they compare
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income currently reports 21,001 against 425.07 in Georgia, a difference of 20,576.
That makes South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income's figure about 49.4 times Georgia's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 45th and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income ranks 47th of 79 countries.
South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 443.59 | 19,119 | 18,676 | South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income |
| 2020s | 505.81 | 23,423 | 22,917 | South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization, Georgia or South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income?
- South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income, at 21,001 against 425.07 in Georgia as of 2027.
- What is the difference in lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization between Georgia and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income?
- 20,576, with South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.
- How do Georgia and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income rank globally for lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization?
- Georgia ranks 45th and South-Eastern Asia and the Pacific: Upper-middle income ranks 47th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. LU4 represents the share of the extended labour force that are in unemployment, time-related underemployment or the potential labour force. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.