Chile vs Rwanda: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization
LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization over time
- Chile
- Rwanda
How they compare
Chile currently reports 2,536 against 2,224 in Rwanda, a difference of 312.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 15th and Rwanda ranks 17th of 79 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,499 | 2,164 | 335.61 | Chile |
| 2020s | 2,543 | 2,347 | 195.65 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization, Chile or Rwanda?
- Chile, at 2,536 against 2,224 in Rwanda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization between Chile and Rwanda?
- 312, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Rwanda?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Rwanda rank globally for lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization?
- Chile ranks 15th and Rwanda ranks 17th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. LU4 represents the share of the extended labour force that are in unemployment, time-related underemployment or the potential labour force. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.