Chile vs Italy: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization
LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization over time
- Chile
- Italy
How they compare
Italy currently reports 4,341 against 2,536 in Chile, a difference of 1,805.
That makes Italy's figure about 1.7 times Chile's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 15th and Italy ranks 12th of 79 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,497 | 6,739 | 4,242 | Italy |
| 2020s | 2,544 | 5,642 | 3,098 | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization, Chile or Italy?
- Italy, at 4,341 against 2,536 in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization between Chile and Italy?
- 1,805, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Italy?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Italy rank globally for lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization?
- Chile ranks 15th and Italy ranks 12th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. LU4 represents the share of the extended labour force that are in unemployment, time-related underemployment or the potential labour force. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.