What is the difference in lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization between Central Africa and Norway?

18,043, with Central Africa ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Central Africa and Norway?

19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

International Labour Organization, published as LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Central Africa vs Norway: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization

Central Africa

18,372

in 2027

Norway

328.77

in 2024

Central Africa rank

48th

Norway rank

47th

LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization over time

Central Africa
Norway

How they compare

Central Africa currently reports 18,372 against 328.77 in Norway, a difference of 18,043.

That makes Central Africa's figure about 55.9 times Norway's.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Central Africa has been ahead every year.

Central Africa ranks 48th and Norway ranks 47th of 87 groups.

Central Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Central Africa	Norway	Difference	Ahead
2000s	9,475	231.39	9,244	Central Africa
2010s	12,269	270.81	11,998	Central Africa
2020s	16,087	319.46	15,767	Central Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization, Central Africa or Norway?: Central Africa, at 18,372 against 328.77 in Norway as of 2027.
What is the difference in lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization between Central Africa and Norway?: 18,043, with Central Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Africa and Norway?: 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Central Africa and Norway rank globally for lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization?: Central Africa ranks 48th and Norway ranks 47th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?: International Labour Organization, published as LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Africa vs Norway: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/lu4-composite-measure-of-labour-underutilization/central-africa/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/lu4-composite-measure-of-labour-underutilization/central-africa/norway/">Central Africa vs Norway: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization
Source: International Labour Organization
Licence: ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage: 166 places, 3,284 data points, 1991–2027
Last refreshed: 05 September 2026

With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. LU4 represents the share of the extended labour force that are in unemployment, time-related underemployment or the potential labour force. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.