Canada vs Zimbabwe: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization

Canada
2,012
in 2025
Zimbabwe
1,657
in 2024
Canada rank
19th
Zimbabwe rank
22nd

LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization over time

  • Canada
  • Zimbabwe
1.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k199720112025

How they compare

Canada currently reports 2,012 against 1,657 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 355.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 79 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 1,668 1,340 327.69 Canada
2020s 1,680 1,588 91.96 Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization, Canada or Zimbabwe?
Canada, at 2,012 against 1,657 in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization between Canada and Zimbabwe?
355, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Zimbabwe?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2024.
How do Canada and Zimbabwe rank globally for lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization?
Canada ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 79 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Zimbabwe: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/lu4-composite-measure-of-labour-underutilization/canada/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/lu4-composite-measure-of-labour-underutilization/canada/zimbabwe/">Canada vs Zimbabwe: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
166 places, 3,284 data points, 1991–2027
Last refreshed

With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. LU4 represents the share of the extended labour force that are in unemployment, time-related underemployment or the potential labour force. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.