Belize vs Malta: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization
LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization over time
- Belize
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 23.66 against 20.63 in Belize, a difference of 3.03.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Belize's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 77th and Malta ranks 76th of 79 countries.
Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization, Belize or Malta?
- Malta, at 23.66 against 20.63 in Belize as of 2024.
- What is the difference in lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization between Belize and Malta?
- 3.03, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Malta?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2017.
- How do Belize and Malta rank globally for lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization?
- Belize ranks 77th and Malta ranks 76th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. LU4 represents the share of the extended labour force that are in unemployment, time-related underemployment or the potential labour force. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.