Asia and the Pacific vs United States of America: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization

Asia and the Pacific
226,697
in 2027
United States of America
10,340
in 2025
Asia and the Pacific rank
6th
United States of America rank
4th

LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization over time

  • Asia and the Pacific
  • United States of America
0100.0k200.0k300.0k199420102027

How they compare

Asia and the Pacific currently reports 226,697 against 10,340 in United States of America, a difference of 216,357.

That makes Asia and the Pacific's figure about 21.9 times United States of America's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Asia and the Pacific has been ahead every year.

Asia and the Pacific ranks 6th and United States of America ranks 4th of 87 groups.

Asia and the Pacific has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Asia and the Pacific United States of America Difference Ahead
2000s 248,226 12,283 235,943 Asia and the Pacific
2010s 242,763 13,070 229,693 Asia and the Pacific
2020s 236,116 11,203 224,913 Asia and the Pacific

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization, Asia and the Pacific or United States of America?
Asia and the Pacific, at 226,697 against 10,340 in United States of America as of 2027.
What is the difference in lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization between Asia and the Pacific and United States of America?
216,357, with Asia and the Pacific ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and the Pacific and United States of America?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Asia and the Pacific and United States of America rank globally for lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization?
Asia and the Pacific ranks 6th and United States of America ranks 4th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Asia and the Pacific vs United States of America: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/lu4-composite-measure-of-labour-underutilization/asia-and-the-pacific/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/lu4-composite-measure-of-labour-underutilization/asia-and-the-pacific/united-states/">Asia and the Pacific vs United States of America: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
166 places, 3,284 data points, 1991–2027
Last refreshed

With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. LU4 represents the share of the extended labour force that are in unemployment, time-related underemployment or the potential labour force. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.