Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income vs Canada: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization

Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income
86,152
in 2027
Canada
2,012
in 2025
Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income rank
18th
Canada rank
19th

LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization over time

  • Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income
  • Canada
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k199720122027

How they compare

Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income currently reports 86,152 against 2,012 in Canada, a difference of 84,140.

That makes Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income's figure about 42.8 times Canada's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income has been ahead every year.

Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income ranks 18th and Canada ranks 19th of 87 groups.

Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income Canada Difference Ahead
2000s 95,714 1,580 94,135 Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income
2010s 95,428 1,784 93,644 Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income
2020s 89,086 1,850 87,235 Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization, Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income or Canada?
Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income, at 86,152 against 2,012 in Canada as of 2027.
What is the difference in lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization between Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income and Canada?
84,140, with Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income and Canada?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income and Canada rank globally for lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization?
Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income ranks 18th and Canada ranks 19th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income vs Canada: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/lu4-composite-measure-of-labour-underutilization/asia-and-the-pacific-lower-middle-income/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/lu4-composite-measure-of-labour-underutilization/asia-and-the-pacific-lower-middle-income/canada/">Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income vs Canada: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
166 places, 3,284 data points, 1991–2027
Last refreshed

With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. LU4 represents the share of the extended labour force that are in unemployment, time-related underemployment or the potential labour force. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.