Asia and the Pacific: High income vs North Macedonia: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization

Asia and the Pacific: High income
10,826
in 2027
North Macedonia
141.91
in 2025
Asia and the Pacific: High income rank
62nd
North Macedonia rank
63rd

LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization over time

  • Asia and the Pacific: High income
  • North Macedonia
05.0k10.0k15.0k200520162027

How they compare

Asia and the Pacific: High income currently reports 10,826 against 141.91 in North Macedonia, a difference of 10,684.

That makes Asia and the Pacific: High income's figure about 76.3 times North Macedonia's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Asia and the Pacific: High income has been ahead every year.

Asia and the Pacific: High income ranks 62nd and North Macedonia ranks 63rd of 87 groups.

Asia and the Pacific: High income has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Asia and the Pacific: High income North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2010s 12,504 295.18 12,209 Asia and the Pacific: High income
2020s 11,616 187.55 11,429 Asia and the Pacific: High income

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization, Asia and the Pacific: High income or North Macedonia?
Asia and the Pacific: High income, at 10,826 against 141.91 in North Macedonia as of 2027.
What is the difference in lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization between Asia and the Pacific: High income and North Macedonia?
10,684, with Asia and the Pacific: High income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and the Pacific: High income and North Macedonia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2025.
How do Asia and the Pacific: High income and North Macedonia rank globally for lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization?
Asia and the Pacific: High income ranks 62nd and North Macedonia ranks 63rd of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Asia and the Pacific: High income vs North Macedonia: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/lu4-composite-measure-of-labour-underutilization/asia-and-the-pacific-high-income/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/lu4-composite-measure-of-labour-underutilization/asia-and-the-pacific-high-income/north-macedonia/">Asia and the Pacific: High income vs North Macedonia: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
166 places, 3,284 data points, 1991–2027
Last refreshed

With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. LU4 represents the share of the extended labour force that are in unemployment, time-related underemployment or the potential labour force. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.