How many years of comparable data are there for APEC and Bangladesh?

5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

International Labour Organization, published as LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

APEC vs Bangladesh: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization

APEC

164,696

in 2027

Bangladesh

5,697

in 2024

APEC rank

8th

Bangladesh rank

6th

LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization over time

APEC
Bangladesh

How they compare

APEC currently reports 164,696 against 5,697 in Bangladesh, a difference of 158,999.

That makes APEC's figure about 28.9 times Bangladesh's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, APEC has been ahead every year.

APEC ranks 8th and Bangladesh ranks 6th of 87 groups.

APEC has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	APEC	Bangladesh	Difference	Ahead
2010s	177,779	5,051	172,728	APEC
2020s	166,107	5,935	160,172	APEC

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization, APEC or Bangladesh?: APEC, at 164,696 against 5,697 in Bangladesh as of 2027.
What is the difference in lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization between APEC and Bangladesh?: 158,999, with APEC ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for APEC and Bangladesh?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
How do APEC and Bangladesh rank globally for lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization?: APEC ranks 8th and Bangladesh ranks 6th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?: International Labour Organization, published as LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

APEC vs Bangladesh: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/lu4-composite-measure-of-labour-underutilization/apec/bangladesh/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/lu4-composite-measure-of-labour-underutilization/apec/bangladesh/">APEC vs Bangladesh: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization
Source: International Labour Organization
Licence: ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage: 166 places, 3,284 data points, 1991–2027
Last refreshed: 05 September 2026

With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. LU4 represents the share of the extended labour force that are in unemployment, time-related underemployment or the potential labour force. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.