Afghanistan vs Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income: LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization
LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization over time
- Afghanistan
- Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income
How they compare
Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income currently reports 86,152 against 1,688 in Afghanistan, a difference of 84,464.
That makes Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income's figure about 51.0 times Afghanistan's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 21st and Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income ranks 18th of 79 countries.
Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,239 | 96,633 | 94,394 | Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income |
| 2020s | 2,511 | 101,930 | 99,419 | Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization, Afghanistan or Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income?
- Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income, at 86,152 against 1,688 in Afghanistan as of 2027.
- What is the difference in lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization between Afghanistan and Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income?
- 84,464, with Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
- How do Afghanistan and Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income rank globally for lu4: composite measure of labour underutilization?
- Afghanistan ranks 21st and Asia and the Pacific: Lower-middle income ranks 18th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. LU4 represents the share of the extended labour force that are in unemployment, time-related underemployment or the potential labour force. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.