Korea vs Switzerland: Long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — Formal long-term
Long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — Formal long-term over time
- Korea
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 8.6 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over against 5.4 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over in Korea, a difference of 3.2 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over.
That makes Switzerland's figure about 1.6 times Korea's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.
Korea ranks 1st and Switzerland ranks 4th of 2 groups.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Korea | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.7 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over | 7.2 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over | 4.5 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 3.45 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over | 8 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over | 4.55 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 5.04 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over | 8.4 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over | 3.36 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — formal long-term, Korea or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 8.6 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over against 5.4 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over in Korea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — formal long-term between Korea and Switzerland?
- 3.2 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Switzerland?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Korea and Switzerland rank globally for long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — formal long-term?
- Korea ranks 1st and Switzerland ranks 4th of 2 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — Formal long-term care employment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset presents key indicators on formal LTC workers at home or in institutions, covering nurses and personal carers, by gender. It also covers their working conditions (part-time or full-time status, fixed-term or permanent employment, and by level of education). Please refer to the Sources and Methods for detailed country-specific information.