Korea vs Netherlands: Long-term care resources: workers Formal long-term care employment

Korea
5.4 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over
in 2024
Netherlands
8.6 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over
in 2024
Korea rank
1st
Netherlands rank
1st

Long-term care resources: workers Formal long-term care employment over time

  • Korea
  • Netherlands
2.557.51012.515200120122024

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 8.6 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over against 5.4 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over in Korea, a difference of 3.2 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over.

That makes Netherlands's figure about 1.6 times Korea's.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.

Korea ranks 1st and Netherlands ranks 1st of 2 groups.

Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Korea Netherlands Difference Ahead
2000s 2.7 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over 12.3 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over 9.6 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over Netherlands
2010s 3.45 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over 9.07 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over 5.62 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over Netherlands
2020s 5.04 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over 8.26 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over 3.22 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — formal long-term, Korea or Netherlands?
Netherlands, at 8.6 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over against 5.4 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over in Korea as of 2024.
What is the difference in long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — formal long-term between Korea and Netherlands?
3.2 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Netherlands?
16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
How do Korea and Netherlands rank globally for long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — formal long-term?
Korea ranks 1st and Netherlands ranks 1st of 2 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — Formal long-term care employment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Korea vs Netherlands: Long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — Formal long-term. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 11 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/long-term-care-resources-and-utilisation-workers-formal-long-term-care-employment/korea/netherlands-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/long-term-care-resources-and-utilisation-workers-formal-long-term-care-employment/korea/netherlands-2/">Korea vs Netherlands: Long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — Formal long-term</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — Formal long-term care employment
Unit
Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
23 places, 441 data points, 1995–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset presents key indicators on formal LTC workers at home or in institutions, covering nurses and personal carers, by gender. It also covers their working conditions (part-time or full-time status, fixed-term or permanent employment, and by level of education). Please refer to the Sources and Methods for detailed country-specific information.