Israel vs Luxembourg: Long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — Formal long-term

Israel
11.3 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over
in 2025
Luxembourg
7.7 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over
in 2024
Israel rank
3rd
Luxembourg rank
5th

Long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — Formal long-term over time

  • Israel
  • Luxembourg
24681012199520102025

How they compare

Israel currently reports 11.3 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over against 7.7 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over in Luxembourg, a difference of 3.6 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over.

That makes Israel's figure about 1.5 times Luxembourg's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.

Israel ranks 3rd and Luxembourg ranks 5th of 18 countries.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Luxembourg Difference Ahead
1990s 7.4 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over 2.7 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over 4.7 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over Israel
2000s 8.7 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over 5.01 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over 3.69 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over Israel
2010s 10.49 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over 7.58 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over 2.91 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over Israel
2020s 10.96 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over 7.62 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over 3.34 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — formal long-term, Israel or Luxembourg?
Israel, at 11.3 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over against 7.7 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over in Luxembourg as of 2025.
What is the difference in long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — formal long-term between Israel and Luxembourg?
3.6 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Luxembourg?
26 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
How do Israel and Luxembourg rank globally for long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — formal long-term?
Israel ranks 3rd and Luxembourg ranks 5th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — Formal long-term care employment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Luxembourg: Long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — Formal long-term. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/long-term-care-resources-and-utilisation-workers-formal-long-term-care-employment/israel/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/long-term-care-resources-and-utilisation-workers-formal-long-term-care-employment/israel/luxembourg/">Israel vs Luxembourg: Long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — Formal long-term</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — Formal long-term care employment
Unit
Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
23 places, 441 data points, 1995–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset presents key indicators on formal LTC workers at home or in institutions, covering nurses and personal carers, by gender. It also covers their working conditions (part-time or full-time status, fixed-term or permanent employment, and by level of education). Please refer to the Sources and Methods for detailed country-specific information.