Australia vs Luxembourg: Long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — Formal long-term

Australia
7.5 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over
in 2023
Luxembourg
7.7 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over
in 2024
Australia rank
6th
Luxembourg rank
5th

Long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — Formal long-term over time

  • Australia
  • Luxembourg
2468199920112024

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 7.7 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over against 7.5 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over in Australia, a difference of 0.2 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 6th and Luxembourg ranks 5th of 18 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 7.1 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over 6 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over 1.1 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over Australia
2010s 6.65 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over 7.65 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over 1 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over Luxembourg
2020s 7.4 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over 7.6 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over 0.2 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — formal long-term, Australia or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 7.7 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over against 7.5 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — formal long-term between Australia and Luxembourg?
0.2 Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Luxembourg?
5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do Australia and Luxembourg rank globally for long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — formal long-term?
Australia ranks 6th and Luxembourg ranks 5th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — Formal long-term care employment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Luxembourg: Long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — Formal long-term. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/long-term-care-resources-and-utilisation-workers-formal-long-term-care-employment/australia/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/long-term-care-resources-and-utilisation-workers-formal-long-term-care-employment/australia/luxembourg/">Australia vs Luxembourg: Long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — Formal long-term</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Long-term care resources and utilisation - workers — Formal long-term care employment
Unit
Per 100 inhabitants aged 65 years or over
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
23 places, 441 data points, 1995–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset presents key indicators on formal LTC workers at home or in institutions, covering nurses and personal carers, by gender. It also covers their working conditions (part-time or full-time status, fixed-term or permanent employment, and by level of education). Please refer to the Sources and Methods for detailed country-specific information.