Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Zimbabwe: Level of national compliance with labour rights (freedom)

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
1.55
in 2024
Zimbabwe
5.8
in 2024
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
30th
Zimbabwe rank
27th

Level of national compliance with labour rights (freedom) over time

  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
  • Zimbabwe
23456201520192024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 5.8 against 1.55 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 4.25.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 3.7 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 27th of 36 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 1.74 5.08 3.34 Zimbabwe
2020s 1.65 5.74 4.09 Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher level of national compliance with labour rights (freedom of), Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 5.8 against 1.55 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2024.
What is the difference in level of national compliance with labour rights (freedom of) between Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Zimbabwe?
4.25, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Zimbabwe?
10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Zimbabwe rank globally for level of national compliance with labour rights (freedom of)?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 27th of 36 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Level of national compliance with labour rights (freedom of association and collective bargaining) based on International Labour Organization (ILO) textual sources and national legislation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Zimbabwe: Level of national compliance with labour rights (freedom of). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/level-of-national-compliance-with-labour-rights-freedom-of-association-and-collective/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/level-of-national-compliance-with-labour-rights-freedom-of-association-and-collective/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/zimbabwe/">Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Zimbabwe: Level of national compliance with labour rights (freedom of)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Level of national compliance with labour rights (freedom of association and collective bargaining) based on International Labour Organization (ILO) textual sources and national legislation
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
239 places, 2,390 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed