Lithuania vs Norway: Labour indicators levels - Regions — Unemployment

Lithuania
107,800 Persons
in 2025
Norway
136,300 Persons
in 2025
Lithuania rank
37th
Norway rank
35th

Labour indicators levels - Regions — Unemployment over time

  • Lithuania
  • Norway
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k300.0k199520102025

How they compare

Norway currently reports 136,300 Persons against 107,800 Persons in Lithuania, a difference of 28,500 Persons.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.3 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 37th and Norway ranks 35th of 46 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 3 and Norway in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Norway Difference Ahead
1990s 229,900 Persons 75,600 Persons 154,300 Persons Lithuania
2000s 172,930 Persons 86,220 Persons 86,710 Persons Lithuania
2010s 156,100 Persons 101,870 Persons 54,230 Persons Lithuania
2020s 107,700 Persons 118,717 Persons 11,017 Persons Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labour indicators levels - regions — unemployment, Lithuania or Norway?
Norway, at 136,300 Persons against 107,800 Persons in Lithuania as of 2025.
What is the difference in labour indicators levels - regions — unemployment between Lithuania and Norway?
28,500 Persons, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Norway?
27 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2025.
How do Lithuania and Norway rank globally for labour indicators levels - regions — unemployment?
Lithuania ranks 37th and Norway ranks 35th of 46 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Labour indicators levels - Regions — Unemployment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Norway: Labour indicators levels - Regions — Unemployment. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-indicators-levels-regions-unemployment/lithuania/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-indicators-levels-regions-unemployment/lithuania/norway/">Lithuania vs Norway: Labour indicators levels - Regions — Unemployment</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Labour indicators levels - Regions — Unemployment
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
54 places, 1,325 data points, 1995–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset presents indicators on the size of the labour force, employment, and unemployment in large regions (TL2) and, where available, in small regions (TL3). Data definition and source The labour force status is presented by sex, for 15-64 year-olds and 15+ year-olds age ranges, the latter having less country coverage. Data is based on a labour force survey using ILO guidelines and collected from Eurostat (reg_lmk) for EU countries and via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites. Definition of regions Regions are subnational units below national boundaries. OECD countries have two regional levels: large regions (territorial level 2 or TL2) and small regions (territorial level 3 or TL3). For more information, see the OECD Territorial grid (pdf) and the OECD Territorial Correspondence Table (xlsx). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats. Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.