Australia vs Poland: Labour indicators levels - Regions — Unemployment

Australia
660,539 Persons
in 2025
Poland
557,900 Persons
in 2025
Australia rank
16th
Poland rank
18th

Labour indicators levels - Regions — Unemployment over time

  • Australia
  • Poland
01.0M2.0M3.0M199520102025

How they compare

Australia currently reports 660,539 Persons against 557,900 Persons in Poland, a difference of 102,639 Persons.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times Poland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Poland ahead.

Australia ranks 16th and Poland ranks 18th of 46 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Poland Difference Ahead
1990s 639,994 Persons 2.09 million Persons 1.45 million Persons Poland
2000s 563,116 Persons 2.56 million Persons 2.00 million Persons Poland
2010s 687,622 Persons 1.29 million Persons 597,818 Persons Poland
2020s 648,812 Persons 538,950 Persons 109,862 Persons Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labour indicators levels - regions — unemployment, Australia or Poland?
Australia, at 660,539 Persons against 557,900 Persons in Poland as of 2025.
What is the difference in labour indicators levels - regions — unemployment between Australia and Poland?
102,639 Persons, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Poland?
27 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2025.
How do Australia and Poland rank globally for labour indicators levels - regions — unemployment?
Australia ranks 16th and Poland ranks 18th of 46 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Labour indicators levels - Regions — Unemployment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Poland: Labour indicators levels - Regions — Unemployment. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-indicators-levels-regions-unemployment/australia/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-indicators-levels-regions-unemployment/australia/poland/">Australia vs Poland: Labour indicators levels - Regions — Unemployment</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Labour indicators levels - Regions — Unemployment
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
54 places, 1,325 data points, 1995–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset presents indicators on the size of the labour force, employment, and unemployment in large regions (TL2) and, where available, in small regions (TL3). Data definition and source The labour force status is presented by sex, for 15-64 year-olds and 15+ year-olds age ranges, the latter having less country coverage. Data is based on a labour force survey using ILO guidelines and collected from Eurostat (reg_lmk) for EU countries and via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites. Definition of regions Regions are subnational units below national boundaries. OECD countries have two regional levels: large regions (territorial level 2 or TL2) and small regions (territorial level 3 or TL3). For more information, see the OECD Territorial grid (pdf) and the OECD Territorial Correspondence Table (xlsx). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats. Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.