Korea vs United States of America: Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Population
Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Population over time
- Korea
- United States of America
How they compare
United States of America currently reports 41.33 million Persons against 5.82 million Persons in Korea, a difference of 35.51 million Persons.
That makes United States of America's figure about 7.1 times Korea's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.
Korea ranks 1st and United States of America ranks 1st of 2 groups.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Korea | United States of America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.90 million Persons | 42.88 million Persons | 37.98 million Persons | United States of America |
| 2000s | 5.09 million Persons | 47.69 million Persons | 42.61 million Persons | United States of America |
| 2010s | 5.63 million Persons | 50.45 million Persons | 44.82 million Persons | United States of America |
| 2020s | 5.82 million Persons | 54.85 million Persons | 49.03 million Persons | United States of America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — population, Korea or United States of America?
- United States of America, at 41.33 million Persons against 5.82 million Persons in Korea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — population between Korea and United States of America?
- 35.51 million Persons, with United States of America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and United States of America?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
- How do Korea and United States of America rank globally for labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — population?
- Korea ranks 1st and United States of America ranks 1st of 2 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides labour market indicators aggregated at national level and broken down by urban-rural territorial typology. Data source and definition The indicators include labour indicators at place of residence by type of territory. Data is based on a labor force survey using ILO methodology and collected from Eurostat (reg_lmk) for EU countries and via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites. Territorial typology The OECD classifies TL3 regions as predominantly urban, intermediate or predominantly rural; rural regions can be further split into “close to city” and “remote” (see methodology (pdf)). This typology supports analysis of socio-economic differences across regions. See also the OECD Territorial Correspondence Table (xlsx) and the OECD Territorial grid (pdf). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.