Denmark vs Tunisia: Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Population

Denmark
2.49 million Persons
in 2026
Tunisia
3.25 million Persons
in 2018
Denmark rank
22nd
Tunisia rank
20th

Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Population over time

  • Denmark
  • Tunisia
01.0M2.0M3.0M199520102026

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 3.25 million Persons against 2.49 million Persons in Denmark, a difference of 758,430 Persons.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.3 times Denmark's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 22nd and Tunisia ranks 20th of 37 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Tunisia Difference Ahead
2000s 2.14 million Persons 3.02 million Persons 889,341 Persons Tunisia
2010s 2.27 million Persons 3.18 million Persons 905,883 Persons Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — population, Denmark or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 3.25 million Persons against 2.49 million Persons in Denmark as of 2018.
What is the difference in labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — population between Denmark and Tunisia?
758,430 Persons, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Tunisia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
How do Denmark and Tunisia rank globally for labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — population?
Denmark ranks 22nd and Tunisia ranks 20th of 37 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Tunisia: Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Population. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-indicators-by-urban-rural-territorial-typology-population/denmark/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-indicators-by-urban-rural-territorial-typology-population/denmark/tunisia/">Denmark vs Tunisia: Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Population
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
40 places, 1,019 data points, 1995–2026
Last refreshed

This dataset provides labour market indicators aggregated at national level and broken down by urban-rural territorial typology. Data source and definition The indicators include labour indicators at place of residence by type of territory. Data is based on a labor force survey using ILO methodology and collected from Eurostat (reg_lmk) for EU countries and via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites. Territorial typology The OECD classifies TL3 regions as predominantly urban, intermediate or predominantly rural; rural regions can be further split into “close to city” and “remote” (see methodology (pdf)). This typology supports analysis of socio-economic differences across regions. See also the OECD Territorial Correspondence Table (xlsx) and the OECD Territorial grid (pdf). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.