Chile vs Lithuania: Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Population
Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Population over time
- Chile
- Lithuania
How they compare
Chile currently reports 1.91 million Persons against 1.57 million Persons in Lithuania, a difference of 339,200 Persons.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Lithuania ahead.
Chile ranks 28th and Lithuania ranks 30th of 37 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.90 million Persons | 1.81 million Persons | 97,348 Persons | Chile |
| 2010s | 2.22 million Persons | 1.60 million Persons | 613,980 Persons | Chile |
| 2020s | 2.24 million Persons | 1.53 million Persons | 707,576 Persons | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — population, Chile or Lithuania?
- Chile, at 1.91 million Persons against 1.57 million Persons in Lithuania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — population between Chile and Lithuania?
- 339,200 Persons, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Lithuania?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Lithuania rank globally for labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — population?
- Chile ranks 28th and Lithuania ranks 30th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides labour market indicators aggregated at national level and broken down by urban-rural territorial typology. Data source and definition The indicators include labour indicators at place of residence by type of territory. Data is based on a labor force survey using ILO methodology and collected from Eurostat (reg_lmk) for EU countries and via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites. Territorial typology The OECD classifies TL3 regions as predominantly urban, intermediate or predominantly rural; rural regions can be further split into “close to city” and “remote” (see methodology (pdf)). This typology supports analysis of socio-economic differences across regions. See also the OECD Territorial Correspondence Table (xlsx) and the OECD Territorial grid (pdf). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.