Austria vs Chile: Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Population
Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Population over time
- Austria
- Chile
How they compare
Austria currently reports 2.21 million Persons against 1.91 million Persons in Chile, a difference of 304,830 Persons.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 25th and Chile ranks 28th of 37 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.90 million Persons | 1.90 million Persons | 1,484 Persons | Austria |
| 2010s | 2.04 million Persons | 2.22 million Persons | 175,085 Persons | Chile |
| 2020s | 2.16 million Persons | 2.24 million Persons | 83,554 Persons | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — population, Austria or Chile?
- Austria, at 2.21 million Persons against 1.91 million Persons in Chile as of 2026.
- What is the difference in labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — population between Austria and Chile?
- 304,830 Persons, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Chile?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Austria and Chile rank globally for labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — population?
- Austria ranks 25th and Chile ranks 28th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides labour market indicators aggregated at national level and broken down by urban-rural territorial typology. Data source and definition The indicators include labour indicators at place of residence by type of territory. Data is based on a labor force survey using ILO methodology and collected from Eurostat (reg_lmk) for EU countries and via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites. Territorial typology The OECD classifies TL3 regions as predominantly urban, intermediate or predominantly rural; rural regions can be further split into “close to city” and “remote” (see methodology (pdf)). This typology supports analysis of socio-economic differences across regions. See also the OECD Territorial Correspondence Table (xlsx) and the OECD Territorial grid (pdf). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.