Australia vs Norway: Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Population

Australia
2.29 million Persons
in 2025
Norway
2.55 million Persons
in 2026
Australia rank
23rd
Norway rank
21st

Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Population over time

  • Australia
  • Norway
01.0M2.0M3.0M199520102026

How they compare

Norway currently reports 2.55 million Persons against 2.29 million Persons in Australia, a difference of 257,470 Persons.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 23rd and Norway ranks 21st of 37 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Norway Difference Ahead
2010s 1.99 million Persons 2.33 million Persons 345,717 Persons Norway
2020s 2.23 million Persons 2.47 million Persons 241,795 Persons Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — population, Australia or Norway?
Norway, at 2.55 million Persons against 2.29 million Persons in Australia as of 2026.
What is the difference in labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — population between Australia and Norway?
257,470 Persons, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Norway?
10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2025.
How do Australia and Norway rank globally for labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — population?
Australia ranks 23rd and Norway ranks 21st of 37 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Norway: Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Population. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-indicators-by-urban-rural-territorial-typology-population/australia/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-indicators-by-urban-rural-territorial-typology-population/australia/norway/">Australia vs Norway: Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Population
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
40 places, 1,019 data points, 1995–2026
Last refreshed

This dataset provides labour market indicators aggregated at national level and broken down by urban-rural territorial typology. Data source and definition The indicators include labour indicators at place of residence by type of territory. Data is based on a labor force survey using ILO methodology and collected from Eurostat (reg_lmk) for EU countries and via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites. Territorial typology The OECD classifies TL3 regions as predominantly urban, intermediate or predominantly rural; rural regions can be further split into “close to city” and “remote” (see methodology (pdf)). This typology supports analysis of socio-economic differences across regions. See also the OECD Territorial Correspondence Table (xlsx) and the OECD Territorial grid (pdf). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.