Australia vs Israel: Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Population
Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Population over time
- Australia
- Israel
How they compare
Australia currently reports 2.29 million Persons against 2.28 million Persons in Israel, a difference of 14,350 Persons.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 23rd and Israel ranks 24th of 37 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.62 million Persons | 1.49 million Persons | 127,309 Persons | Australia |
| 2010s | 1.93 million Persons | 1.81 million Persons | 112,687 Persons | Australia |
| 2020s | 2.17 million Persons | 2.14 million Persons | 32,670 Persons | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — population, Australia or Israel?
- Australia, at 2.29 million Persons against 2.28 million Persons in Israel as of 2025.
- What is the difference in labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — population between Australia and Israel?
- 14,350 Persons, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Israel?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Israel rank globally for labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — population?
- Australia ranks 23rd and Israel ranks 24th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides labour market indicators aggregated at national level and broken down by urban-rural territorial typology. Data source and definition The indicators include labour indicators at place of residence by type of territory. Data is based on a labor force survey using ILO methodology and collected from Eurostat (reg_lmk) for EU countries and via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites. Territorial typology The OECD classifies TL3 regions as predominantly urban, intermediate or predominantly rural; rural regions can be further split into “close to city” and “remote” (see methodology (pdf)). This typology supports analysis of socio-economic differences across regions. See also the OECD Territorial Correspondence Table (xlsx) and the OECD Territorial grid (pdf). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.